@article {9726,
	title = {The Circumstantial Present as an Antecedent-less (i.e. Substantival) Relative in Coptic},
	journal = {Journal of Egyptian Archaeology},
	volume = {62},
	year = {1976},
	month = {1976},
	pages = {134{\textendash}137},
	abstract = {Coptic disposes of two procedures to express the substantival relative clause ({\textquoteleft}he who{\textellipsis}{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}that which{\textellipsis}{\textquoteright} etc.), namely, either by substituting a substantivator morpheme (of the ⲡ-/ⲧ-/ⲛ- paradigm) for the antecedent, yet in close juncture with the relative-converted form: ⲡⲉⲧ-, ⲡⲉⲛⲧⲁϥ-, ⲡⲉϣⲁϥ-, etc.; or by having an indefinite pronoun or pronominal (ⲟⲩⲁ, ⲣⲱⲙⲉ, ϩⲟⲉⲓⲛⲉ: {\textquoteleft}one{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}any{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}some{\textquoteright}) as antecedent to a circumstantially converted form, as the relative:circumstantial opposition is neutralized, in favour of the latter, when adnominal to a non-ⲡ-determined substantival kernel.[{\textellipsis}]},
	author = {Shisha-Halevy, Ariel}
}
